<$BlogRSDURL$>
WaxWorks
|
Thursday, June 08, 2006
 
A Success that Came Out of Yet Another Failure

While it is certainly good news that Zarqawi is dead, it is worth remembering that Bush could have taken out Zarqawi BEFORE the invasion and did not do it, presumably because it would have weakened the Administration's case for war. Here's NBC's original story:

But NBC News has learned that long before the war the Bush administration
had several chances to wipe out his terrorist operation and perhaps kill Zarqawi
himself — but never pulled the trigger.

In June 2002, U.S. officials say intelligence had revealed that Zarqawi
and members of al-Qaida had set up a weapons lab at Kirma, in northern Iraq,
producing deadly ricin and cyanide.

The Pentagon quickly drafted plans to attack the camp with cruise missiles
and airstrikes and sent it to the White House, where, according to U.S.
government sources, the plan was debated to death in the National Security
Council.

“Here we had targets, we had opportunities, we had a country willing to
support casualties, or risk casualties after 9/11 and we still didn’t do it,”
said Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst with the Brookings
Institution.

Four months later, intelligence showed Zarqawi was planning to use ricin in
terrorist attacks in Europe.

The Pentagon drew up a second strike plan, and the White House again killed
it. By then the administration had set its course for war with
Iraq.

“People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow
Saddam than to execute the president’s policy of preemption against terrorists,”
according to terrorism expert and former National Security Council member Roger
Cressey.

In January 2003, the threat turned real. Police in London arrested six
terror suspects and discovered a ricin lab connected to the camp in
Iraq.

The Pentagon drew up still another attack plan, and for the third time, the
National Security Council killed it.

Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was
airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq
could undercut its case for war against Saddam.

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war,
but it was too late — Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone. “Here’s
a case where they waited, they waited too long and now we’re suffering as a
result inside Iraq,” Cressey added.


So it's important to remember how we got here.

I also found it interesting that, back in December 2003, when Howard Dean said that the capture of Saddam Hussein did not make the U.S. any safer in Iraq, he was roundly dismissed and ridiculed as out of touch by the media. Yet this morning I heard people such as Bill Frist make similar comments about the death of Zarqawi, but I'm still waiting for the backlash.

Comments: Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com