<$BlogRSDURL$>
WaxWorks
|
Wednesday, April 02, 2003
 
Remember during the 2000 campaign how Bush made everybody think he was a moderate, only to govern to the right of Reagan? Well, apparently that's the strategy of Bush's judicial nominees as well -- and not just people like Estrada. Here's a revealing New York Times article about the confirmation hearings for Judge Carolyn Kuhl, Bush nominee for the Ninth Circuit. She tries to distance herself from some of her past right-wing actions, but with little success.

First:

Judge Kuhl told the committee that she was wrong to have argued vigorously as a lawyer in the Reagan Justice Department that the administration reverse a longstanding policy and provide tax-exempt status to Bob Jones University, despite its racial discrimination. She said that she was a young lawyer at the time and did not realize that it was the obligation of the Justice Department to defend rulings like the one made by the Internal Revenue Service on the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University.

Then this:

Judge Kuhl was asked about a memoir by Charles Fried, the Reagan administration's solicitor general and her boss, that describes her as one of the two most vigorous advocates for using a 1986 Supreme Court case to urge the justices to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that first found a constitutional right to abortion. She said she had been trying to put into practice President Reagan's stance against the Roe decision.

Judge Kuhl, who has been nominated to the federal appeals court based in California, pre-empted questions about her views on well-known cases by saying, "as a judge, I don't have personal views about cases anymore."


And, finally, this:

She was also questioned closely about a case that involved a doctor who was treating a woman for breast cancer and invited a drug company salesman to observe his examination of the woman's breasts and abdomen. The doctor told the woman the man was helping him in his medical practice. The woman described the doctor and the salesman as laughing at her when she needed to use a fan to control her flushing.

When the woman discovered the observer was a salesman, she sued under the state's privacy law. Judge Kuhl dismissed the suit against the salesman, saying that his presence "was not highly offensive as a matter of law" and the patient did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. A three-judge appeals court reversed, saying that the conduct was "highly offensive" and clearly violated the California law....

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, said her ruling defied common sense and would outrage 99 out of 100 women.


Apparently, Judge Kuhl is the 100th woman who wouldn't be outraged.

|
Tuesday, April 01, 2003
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's been a while. While this war has been going on, there just hasn't been a lot to post. But here's some good stuff:

"In a speech earlier today President Bush said if Iraq gets rid of Saddam
Hussein, he will help the Iraqi people with food, medicine, supplies,
housing, education – anything that's needed. Isn't that amazing? He
finally comes up with a domestic agenda – and it's for Iraq. Maybe we
could bring that here if it works out." -- Jay Leno

"Democrats were quick to point out that President Bush's budget creates a
1 trillion dollar deficit. The White House quickly responded with 'Hey,
look over there, it's Saddam Hussein.'" -- Craig Kilborn

"We have it. The smoking gun. The evidence. The potential weapon of mass
destruction we have been looking for as our pretext of invading Iraq.
There's just one problem -- it's in North Korea." -- Jon Stewart

"War continues in Iraq. They're calling it Operation Iraqi Freedom. They
were going to call it Operation Iraqi Liberation until they realized that
spells 'OIL.'" -- Jay Leno



Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com