WaxWorks
|
Friday, May 21, 2004
Time to Play "Who Said It?" Again!
O.K., here goes. Can you guess who made these statements on Wednesday?
The difference between Mr. Kerry and Mr. Gore "is the difference between a spruce tree and petrified wood," Mr. [X] said.
"Gore was petrified wood," he said. "He was stiff as a board, he didn't want to have these kinds of meetings. He didn't want to have meetings like this when he was vice president three years before the election. Kerry is much more open."
...
Mr. [X] said, "[Kerry] said he had an exit strategy [for Iraq], and that he's going to elaborate it," and added that he had not pressed Mr. Kerry for details.
...
Mr. [X] had nothing but kind things to say about Mr. Kerry.... He said he and Mr. Kerry had done a little reminiscing. Mr. [X] recalled inviting Mr. Kerry over for a meeting in 1971 after Mr. Kerry gave his searing testimony against the Vietnam War to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee...
"I've known him a long time," Mr. [X] said. "It's hard not to like a 27-year-old guy who comes back from the war and helps lead the antiwar movement."
Mr. [X] was almost effusive in his praise of Mr. Kerry. "I think he's very presidential," he said. "He has a very confident demeanor. I've noticed it on TV."
Mr. [X] made clear he had watched Mr. Kerry closely during the Democratic primary season. "He's an interesting politician. My sense of him is that the more dynamic the citizenry becomes, the more engaged voters become, the better a candidate he is. Compared to other candidates, who no matter what the citizens do they're in a fixed position."
For example, he added, "when people in town halls applauded him talking about getting tough with corporate power, he responded," by emphasizing the issue more. "Gephardt didn't," Mr. [X] said, referring to Representative Richard A. Gephardt, a Democratic also-ran.
Mr. [X] said what struck him about Mr. Kerry was not so much what he said but "the way he says it," adding: "That's important. You don't want to have someone with a squeaky voice."
Mr. [X] even went so far as to offer Mr. Kerry some campaign feedback, including a jab at Mr. Kerry's top political consultant. "The more he cuts the reins of his advisers, the better he's going to do," Mr. [X] said. "His own instincts are less cautious than Bob Shrum's. And after a while, you should be able to follow your own compass."
Mr. [X] also said he was taken with how at ease Mr. Kerry seemed in the meeting. Mr. [X] "thought he was much more relaxed than his associates."
"That was very visible."
So who is Mr. X? Clinton? Dean?
Nope. It's Ralph Nader. That's right. So go back again, re-read those effusive quotes, and ask yourself, "Why the fuck is Nader running then?"
Thursday, May 20, 2004
JFK and RFK
As I studied more about it in school, I became a strong admirer of Robert Kennedy and his 1968 campaign for President. Given the turmoil of that year and what resulted from it, it's not far fetched to think that history could have been dramatically different if RFK hadn't been shot in June 1968. His presidential campaign had a unique way of bringing dissident groups together -- white and black, urban and rural, etc, in a way no politician has been able to since.
A new PBS documentary on RFK that is coming out in October illustrates this nicely:
There is a memorable moment in the PBS documentary when Bobby Kennedy makes one of his first campaign appearances in the Midwest, at the University of Kansas, in front of a jam-packed audience that responds to his call for abandoning "the bankrupt policies we're following at the present" with thunderous cheers.
A photographer for Life magazine traveling with Kennedy can't believe what he's seeing. Walinsky recounts how the man turned to him and yelled: "This is Kansas, fucking Kansas… He's going all the fucking way!"
Kennedy's ability to move beyond divisions that threatened to tear our country apart and reach out to all Americans -- black and white, rich and poor, young and old, urban and rural -- meant that every place, even a bastion of conservatism like Kansas, was suddenly in play. Every state was a swing state.
That's why I thought Arianna Huffington's column about RFK and Kerry was so interesting. It's worth a read.
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
|
Monday, May 17, 2004
Kerry/McCain
Andrew Sullivan weighs in, in favor of such a unity ticket. His list of the reasons why McCain would be a good choice seem right on to me.
Some Democrats have commented that McCain is pro-life and pro-Bush tax cuts, and thus should not be considered. While he is certainly pro-life, his support of Bush's tax cuts is not at all settled. After all, McCain was one of only two Republicans (Lincoln Chafee was the other) who voted against Bush's 2001 tax cuts. Conversely, Jim Jeffords voted FOR Bush's 2001 tax cuts, yet we've welcomed him into our caucus. The pro-life thing doesn't bother me as much, even though I'm pro-choice, because Kerry will be picking the judges.
Secret Weapon
I've long thought that Pennsylvania would end up falling in Kerry's column by November and months ago, I noted that I thought one factor could be Teresa Heinz Kerry's presence in Pennsylvania, and Pittsburgh in particular. According to the U.S. News and World Report's "Washington Whispers," the Kerry camp believes this too:
'Mother Teresa'
Sen. John Kerry 's campaign has a message for the White House's Karl Rove: Forget Pennsylvania. That's because they're unleashing Teresa Heinz Kerry in her home state, where she's more popular than even former Gov. Tom Ridge, now head of homeland security. Friends say her philanthropic work through the Heinz Foundation has led many Pittsburghers to dub her "Mother Teresa." Says one ally: "She's the secret to wasting all the time Karl Rove invested in there."