Jonah Goldberg has this one line post up at The Corner.

So where does Karl Rove report to get his reputation back?

It occurs to me that this may be meant in jest. Jonah is not without a
sense of humor. But I'll assume for the sake of discussion that he's being
serious.

As Andrew Sullivan aptly quips, maybe Rove can go look for it in South
Carolina. More to the point, let's not forget the salient facts here. The
question going back three years ago now is whether Karl Rove knowingly
participated in leaking the identity of a covert CIA operative for the purpose
of discrediting a political opponent who was revealing information about the
White House's use of intelligence in the lead-up to the Iraq War.

That was the issue. From the beginning, Rove, through Scott McClellan,
denied that he did any of that. There weren't even any clever circumlocutions.
He just lied. From admissions from Rove, filings in the Libby case, and
uncontradicted reportage, we know as clearly as we ever can that Rove did do
each of those things.

So he did do what he was suspected of and he did lie about it.

Now, I'm happy to take Patrick Fitzgerald's word for it, his evaluation of
the evidence, that there's not enough evidence to indict Rove on any criminal
charge. As Rove's defenders have long made clear, the underlying statute dealing
with revealing the identities of covert operatives is very hard to bring a
charge with. Same goes for making false statements or perjury. Hard to prove and
you need lots of evidence as to intent and so forth.

In fact, not only am I happy to take Fitzgerald's word for it, if this is
in fact the case, good for Fitzgerald. A prosecutor's role is not to punish
people for malicious acts. It is to ascertain whether they've committed specific
criminal acts and determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a
charge.

But none of this changes the fact, for which there is abundant evidence,
even admissions from Rove himself, that he did the malicious act. And he lied
about doing it. Indeed, on top of that, President Bush welched on his promise to
can anyone who was involved.

So, what reputation is it exactly that Rove wants back? I think this
development leaves Rove's reputation quite intact.