<$BlogRSDURL$>
WaxWorks
|
Wednesday, April 14, 2004
 
This is Called Not Answering the Question

As expected, Bush was asked at his news conference about why he and Cheney are appearing together before the 9/11 Commission:

BUSH: Let's see here, hold on. Michael?

QUESTION: Mr. President, why are you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the 9-11 commission? And, Mr. President, who will we be handing the Iraqi government over to on June 30th?

BUSH: We'll find that out soon. That's what Mr. Brahimi is doing. He's figuring out the nature of the entity we'll be handing sovereignty over.

And, secondly, because the 9-11 commission wants to ask us questions, that's why we're meeting. And I look forward to meeting with them and answering their questions.

QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE) I was asking why you're appearing together, rather than separately, which was their request.

BUSH: Because it's a good chance for both of us to answer questions that the 9-11 commission is looking forward to asking us. And I'm looking forward to answering them.


Josh Marshall also notes that after Bush's dodge on the 9/11 commission question about him and Cheney meeting together, hands were going up left and right with follow up questions. Bush deflected those by claiming to have some "must-calls" and goes... to a Washington Times and Fox News questioner who nicely changes the subject and gives the President a softball.

BUSH: Let's see. Hold on for a minute. Let's see. Oh, Jim.

QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President.

BUSH: I've got some must-calls. I'm sorry.

QUESTION: You have been accused of letting the 9-11 threat mature too far, but not letting the Iraq threat mature far enough. First, could you respond to that general criticism?

And, secondly, in the wake of these two conflicts, what is the appropriate threat level to justify action in perhaps other situations going forward?


I also liked the fact that we apparently have a powershare at the State Department:

BUSH: Secretary of State Powell and Secretary of State Rumsfeld and a number of NATO defense and foreign ministers are exploring a more formal role for NATO, such as turning the Polish-led division into a NATO operation and giving NATO specific responsibilities for border control.

Comments: Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com